Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Dan Patrick takes weird Stance on Mayor White's SAFEclear program

Mayor White's SAFEclear program is a topic of lots of discussion on Houston talk radio these days.

With the New Year's festivities behind, Houston drivers took to the freeways today, and many of them were confronted with Mayor White's expensive and intrusive new SAFEclear program (which we've dubbed $AFEclear), by which an oligopoly of wrecker services patrol Houston's freeways at all times of the day, and are charged with the task of forcibly towing all disabled vehicles for a $75 fee (unless the car must be towed to a storage facility, at which point storage fees will begin to accrue). The Mayor's program makes it a Class C misdemeanor for any other wrecker service outside the $AFEclear oligopoly to tow vehicles within the $AFEclear zone. The program launched without any facility for those with insurance or auto club programs to be directly billed for this "service."

The unfortunate victim of a flat tire has 6 minutes to change the tire, or they must pay $75 to be towed. Anyone who doesn't have the $75 will have there automobile towed to a storage facility where they will be subjected to storage additional fees. The law doesn't take into consideration light traffic conditions, or pulling well into a safe area. Dan Patrick took the strange stance of supporting this ordinance. Perhaps he is hesitant not to support a mayor that isn't mayor Lee Brown.

Dan Patrick devoted his two hour show on KSEV-700 today to the topic.

Patrick likes to play up his station's independent status and the fact that he gives Houston-area citizens a voice (in the fight for property tax relief, as one example). So it came as a surprise today that Patrick endorsed every city talking point about the $AFEclear program. He interviewed David Saperstein, who is the chair of the mayorÂ’s Office on Mobility (or traffic "czar"), and then a tow company owner who has secured one of the franchises. Safety, clear roads and rubbernecking seemed to be the big talking points, and Patrick was in full agreement with Saperstein on all of them. He told Czar Saperstein that he found the Safe Clear program "comforting," and seemed not to be troubled by such problems as someone finding it a financial hardship to have at least $75 on hand while driving Houston freeways. He commented that he carried a $100 bill on him at all times. In response to one caller who expressed concern about some people not being able to afford the minimum $75 price tag, Patrick said that perhaps people who couldn't afford a tow shouldn't be driving on the roads anyway.

Seriously!

Patrick even suggested to Czar Saperstein that the city should get AJ Foyt to narrate some Public Service Announcements for the Safe Clear program. Then Patrick helpfully offered to run those PSA's on KSEV. Czar Saperstein said he thought that was a great idea.

It is very disappointing that Patrick, who frequently claims to stand up for average folks on his radio station (and to suggest they donate to CLOUT), doesn't see a single problem with this program. He's happy, apparently, because the roads will be clear for him, and since he always carries a $100 bill, why be concerned about a measly $75 towing charge.

He definitely came across as an elite country club conservative.

On the other hand, the $AFEclear program drew considerable ire from Chris Baker on his highly rated KTRH-740 program. Baker's chief complaints about $AFEclear are that it's intrusive and expensive to motorists, it's designed as much to enhance municipal revenues as to improve mobility, and it's likely to have a disproportionate impact on poor people in the city. Various callers contended that bidding for the $AFEclear program netted the city nearly $1 million in new revenues (we have not confirmed that figure) and that the city's authority may conflict with DPS authority over the freeways (since they are not city but state property), among the more general complaints about the mayor's policy.

3 Comments:

On Wednesday, 05 January, 2005, Anonymous said...

1. Devise a $cheme that lines the right pockets

(Hey! the autoclubs are getting ALL the money for tows. Let's make up a new law so we get our cut. Hey now, if we're going to go all out and make a law, why settle for just a cut?)

2. Sugar-coat and redress it so the sheep buy it.

3. Find a personality with a following; have a secret meeting with 'personality' so that 'personality' hawks it all nice and sugar-coated to the sheep.

Blaaa Blaaa Blaaa!

 
On Thursday, 06 January, 2005, Kevin said...

Thanks for the link to blogHOUSTON!

Anonymous: On point #3 -- are you asserting something like this actually happened, or are you just throwing out a scenario for fun? If you know something tangible about any such meeting, please do share, either here or via email to me from blogHOUSTON. :)

 
On Thursday, 06 January, 2005, Liberty said...

Kevin, I enjoy your blog a lot and find it a great source of whats going on in Houston. I find that Dan Patrick lost a lot of editorial "gutsiness" when he lost Matthews. Matthews had a knack for getting on the issues early and smelling a foul odor before most, then getting the rest of us behind him. Dan is more concerned about getting along with Mayor White, He likes him, a lot of us do, but iy doesn't mean he can't screw up. I believe he did big time with this one.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home