Appendix A
Replicating the Kehr Experiments
"All
truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is
violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer
(1788-1860)
General Information
For Everyone
Replicating my two
types of experiments is actually quite simple, however, there are some very
important things that must be done right or the experiment will fail.
This experiment can
be done with a laser or a telescope, but do not use both for safety
reasons. The key to a successful
experiment is to understand the importance of the stability of the platform
the laser or telescope and mirrors are on.
The stability of the target is far less significant, though not even
this can be totally ignored. Instability
of the platform the laser or telescope is on can be caused by using a table or
tripod with any wood in it (because wood slowly compresses when it has weight
on it), by putting the table or tripod on a surface that is not absolutely
stable (such as on an asphalt road during the day), by doing the experiment in
an environment that does not have overall stability (such as inside a high rise
building), etc.
For example, in our
early experiments the laser was bolted to a wooden table. We placed a concrete block above each wooden
table leg to stabilize it and compress the wooden legs. In doing a 72-hour experiment, it was clear
that the wood did not completely compress during the first 48 hours. It was only during the third day that we got
any kind of stability in our beam. At
the time we did not know just how sensitive the experiment was to stability
issues, nor did I know I should have been looking for a dot.
As another example,
in two of our outdoor laser experiments we placed the laser table on an asphalt
road. Unknown to us at the time is that
asphalt expands when it gets cold (sic) and contracts when it gets hot
(sic). Plus the wood table the laser
was sitting on compressed during the experiment.
Likewise, the first
telescope tripod we used was a wooden tripod.
The wood on the tripod compressed during the 24 hours, thus throwing off
the experiment.
Also, during our
earliest telescope experiments, the telescope was placed on carpet (sic). With hindsight, the carpet obviously
compressed during the experiment. (Dare
I admit that for one experiment I taped a telescope to a file cabinet and had a
thick pile of paper between the telescope and the metal file cabinet?)
Another problem with
the telescope experiment was the tripod head.
During one experiment there was torque in the head of a metal tripod,
and this torque released during the experiment, throwing off our measurements.
In another case the
telescope was not balanced properly on the tripod head and this caused the
telescope to drop ever so slightly during the experiment.
In another case, the
telescope was placed on a concrete floor (wrapped around a weight bearing post)
on the third floor of a nine-story building.
I didn't know that the sun and outside temperatures caused the entire building
to twist and move up and down slightly over the 24-hour period. Furthermore, tall buildings are designed to
bend with the wind.
In short, we made a
lot of mistakes before we figured out how to get the incredible stability we
needed for the laser or telescope and mirrors.
It is clear that the
laser or telescope must be put on a steel tripod or steel table or concrete
block. But even that is not
enough. The tripod, table or block must
be sitting on a concrete or rock foundation.
The entire experiment must be done underground or on the first floor of
a one-story building. But even that is
not enough. If it is sitting on
concrete, the concrete must be right next to a weight bearing wall or the
concrete must be poured directly on top of the ground. The reason it really should be underground
has to do with the necessary constant temperature of the air and floor and the
temperature of the tripod. A stable
temperature, stable equipment and stable ground are absolutely required. There is simply no way that the experiment
can be done outdoors because of temperature fluctuations. The ideal location would be deep inside of a
cave, where there are rock foundations that each piece of equipment can be
placed on.
It is clear than
everything associated with the table or tripod has to be metal or
concrete. Everything has to be
perfectly balanced, it has to be locked down tight, and cannot have any
torque. Everything involved with the
experiment must be placed on weight bearing concrete (no air space can be
beneath the concrete) or solid rock. As
I said, the experiment ideally should be underground or in a large one-story
building.
The target does not
need that kind of stability, although I would put the target on a concrete
floor (it does not need to be near a weight bearing wall or be concrete poured
on dirt).
If using mirrors, the
mirrors should have virtually the same stability as the telescope or
lasers. It is critical that the mirrors
to not tilt or twist during the experiment.
Photographing the experiment
with a web cam, digital video recorder, etc. is critical, unless someone wants
to baby-sit the experiment all night long and physically put a dot on the
target each hour. Fortunately, web cams
are almost ubiquitous. Likewise,
personal computers are ubiquitous. The
problem with web cams is that even a low powered laser beam will saturate the
image, making it white and the image may even blur the entire screen. When using a helium-neon laser, there is no
way I could have used a web cam. Even
when using a red-beamed Torpedo Laser-Level the image came out white.
For High School and
College Undergraduates
When I first
requested funding in 1997 I asked for $16,000 for a telescope, camera, tape
recorder, etc. In 1998, when I asked
for funding again, I asked for $4,000 for a helium-neon laser, several wooden
targets, labor to build the very special targets, and other things. Today, my experiment can be done with a
budget of about $100, excluding any web cam or computer.
The laser that is
needed is called a "Torpedo Laser Level," or something akin to
one. It is used in construction as a
very long bubble level. These can be
purchased from a company such as "Calpac Lasers"
(http://www.calpaclasers.com/) or at a large hardware store. The mirrors are called "Elliptical Flat
Secondary Mirrors" and are used to build telescopes. They can be purchased from a company like
"Orion Telescopes and Binoculars" at: http://www.telescope.com/. The laser should cost about $60.00 and each
mirror should cost about $10.00. The
metal box that the mirrors are put outside of are standard
electrical boxes.
My Torpedo Laser
Level worked at home during a 48 hour test.
But when we went to an experiment site it died after 14 hours. I still don't know if it died because of the
power converter. I strongly suggest
buying the very inexpensive ($12 or so) power supply or adapter from the same
company the laser is purchased from.
That way if there is a problem there is only one place to go.
For Graduate Students
and Professionals (Very High Precision)
A telescope is better
than a laser, in fact don't even consider a laser. This is because a telescope of sufficient magnification can see a
pinhole at several hundred feet. But a
laser beam expands (i.e. beam divergence), even with a collimator. But in any case, it is always difficult to
measure where the center of a laser beam is.
The target for the
telescope should be grid paper, or some other type of paper with lines that can
be easily seen and are pre-measured.
You essentially pick a point on the grid paper and zoom in on that
point. Using telescopes, the movement
that point (on the CCD image) during the experiment is what you are looking
for. The point on the target must be
recorded by a CCD camera.
The last experiment
we did with a telescope used an 8" f10 Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope with a
2X Barlow and a CCD camera. The
experiment was done about 15 feet underground and measurements were taken every
15 minutes. At 300' the maximum point
movement was less than 1/20th of an inch.
No pattern was detected at that magnification, all motion was
random. Part of the movement may have
been caused by one of the tripod legs being a couple of feet away from the
weight bearing post and thus this leg moved slightly up and down with the
concrete floor during the experiment.
In fact all of the movement of the point in this experiment may have
been because of this.
I think the next
level of equipment from what I have used would be a 12" f15
Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope with a 5X Barlow.
This equipment would require a very high resolution, high quality CCD
camera. I would not have any people in
the section of the cave or mine where the experiment was being conducted
because of body heat and breath heat.
Furthermore I would let the equipment and temperature stabilize for two
days before beginning the experiment.
The experiment would last several days to establish the consistency of
any pattern. I would light the target
with light that generates very low heat.
In fact, instead of using grid paper you might want to consider using
LED lights.
If the experiment
must be outdoors, astronomers have considerable experience in the subject of
concrete bases. Field geologists can
also add valuable input. Clearly, some
very deep concrete or rock section must be found. The concrete or rock must in the shade all day long and every
attempt must be made to keep the temperature stable around the telescope (this
would require heat and air conditioning inside of a tent or building with the
telescope pointed out of a door or open window).
The paradox is that the
more powerful the telescope, the more stable the floor and equipment need to be! It would do no good to get a huge telescope
if it is not going to have a massively strong base, put on a rock floor
hundreds of feet underground, where the temperature is very stable for days or
thousands of years at a time.
In doing this
experiment there should never be any pattern because of ether drag. This is because the vector of the line
between the telescope and target are constant relative to the rotation of the
earth underneath the ether drag. The
amount of sensitivity needed is far to great to try and rotate the equipment on
a platform.